Why Aren’t You Linking Your Posts To Your Blog?
Posted by Mitch Mitchell on Mar 28, 2011
There’s something going on these days that I really don’t understand. I’ll be on Twitter and I’ll see someone linking to a post or an article that they want to share. Since I know them, I click on the link to see what I’m going to be reading. However, instead of taking me directly to the article, it takes me someplace else where I now have to click on the link to read the article.
![]() by Richard Stine |
I must be missing the point about blog directories or social sharing sites. Sites such as StumbleUpon or Digg or Amplify or Ping.FM or any of the others allow people to post links to them, kind of like Delicious. Then those sites help them build up readership or visits or traffic in some way, supposedly, because people are visiting those sites and reading one’s material through them.
Okay, I get that… kind of. I only use Delicious to post some of my articles, but I’ve never gone through a single article I’ve ever seen there. I have a Technorati account more for the tracking of blog performance than anything else, even though I’ve pretty much decided it’s a joke since their numbers don’t make any sense to me anymore. I’ve never known if I get any bounce through those sites or not. According to Google Analytics, almost nothing comes from those sites now, though I can’t say whether it’s always been the case.
However, what I don’t get is why someone would send a post to Twitter through those sites instead of just sending people to their blogs. Maybe for articles that they’ve posted that belong to someone else that aren’t on blogs it makes sense, but otherwise… someone will have to explain this one to me.
It works differently in a few other places. For instance, on both Facebook and LinkedIn you can post a link to your blog post but you’d be irritating everyone is you posted your entire post into either of those sites. As a matter of fact, you wouldn’t want to do it anyway because suddenly you’d have duplicate content; that’s never good. Even so, what good would it do me to post a link to a blog post of mine on Facebook, then go to Twitter or wherever and post the link to my Facebook account so people can only see the headlines there and click on the post so they can come here?
Nope, I’m missing it; I don’t get it. And I know some of you are doing this. So, if you’re not afraid to “out” yourself, can you explain to me how this benefits you?
Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2011 Mitch Mitchell




I'm Just Sharing is where I share my thoughts on internet marketing, writing, blogging and many other things. You never know what I'll be posting on. So keep coming back, read, enjoy, and buy something! ;)


It’s, for now, just an experiment I am going though, to see what kind of benefits in traffic and clicks this might give to me, I read it somewhere (wish I remembered where, I will point you to the post if I find it again) and I decided to give it a go.
It’s not annoying ’cause it doesn’t really bring you to a “page-in-the-middle” as Delicious does.
I saw some other annoying example of what you say though. Sometimes, clicking a legitimate bit.ly link brings me to a totally different website, full of ads and banners, and with just an excerpt of the post I wanted to read, with a link to the full article which finally brings me to the blog itself. Now THIS is something I dislike.
Reply
Mitch Mitchell Reply:
March 28th, 2011 at 4:16 PM
Reply
You can now comment on my blog without any problems.
I actually have a few things set up to feed when my post goes live. The post only gets shared on Twitter via my Network Blogs of Facebook. I share links on both my Facebook personal page and Fan page. I think that’s all I do.
I never do what you mention in your post. At least I don’t think I have.
There is an option to share your post on Stumbleupon via Twitter, but I never do that, unless it’s someone else’s article. I also only stumble my articles when they are really informative. I know you’re probably thinking they should all be informative, which they are, but there are some posts, I’d rather not be stumbled at least not by me.
I’ve seen what you’re talking about and it can get on your nerves.
Reply
Mitch Mitchell Reply:
March 28th, 2011 at 5:13 PM
It seems like you’re of the same mindset as Gabriele and myself, that being that it seems unnecessary to include the middle man in trying to get our blog posts and anything else we care about out to the public. Of course, me being contrary like I can be at times, only belonging to one blogging social site (I don’t include Blogshares) instead of all of them might seem to hold me back some, but I don’t like the controlling nature of sites such as Digg, which I know has dropped lots of people who it suddenly determines it doesn’t like to play with anymore. Nope, not getting a shot at me.
Reply
Reply
Mitch Mitchell Reply:
March 29th, 2011 at 1:22 AM
Reply
Carl Reply:
March 29th, 2011 at 8:13 AM
Reply
Mitch Mitchell Reply:
March 29th, 2011 at 2:39 PM
Reply
- the problem lies in having to login but also from a sharing point of view, if you have people on both facebook and also following on twitter, they see both things and it gets repeated. Managing that is almost as problematic in my view.
Reply
Mitch Mitchell Reply:
March 29th, 2011 at 2:41 PM
Reply
From what I understand I think there might be some of this cases:
1. They might be getting paid if they deliver traffic to that link (you know like adfly or something like that).
2. They might want to get more votes or pageviews on that network
3. They might want to gain some link juice from that network and they mass share that link in order to get indexed and they included by mistake twitter too.
4. I don’t know why
.
Reply
Mitch Mitchell Reply:
March 29th, 2011 at 3:20 PM
Reply
When the plugins do whatever it is they do, Facebook creates a Note. I usually get a few likes, if nothing else. Sometimes, I get full-blown commentary in the Facebook stream and that person will not come to the blog afterwards.
Interestingly, with Google Plus, I wonder if sharing is considered duplicate content.
Cheers,
Mitch
Reply
Mitch Mitchell Reply:
July 12th, 2011 at 2:14 AM
Reply
I haven’t had an issue with it going to other sites first, but now that I typed that I’m sure it will come up lol
Reply
Mitch Mitchell Reply:
July 12th, 2011 at 2:15 AM
Reply