Social Media, SEO
& Your Business

by Mitch Mitchell

Using Your Website
As A Marketing Tool

by Mitch Mitchell


Follow Me On Twitter;
Click The Bird!

Add me on Google Plus!

Embrace The Lead
by T. T. Mitchell


Free Download; right-click on book

Leadership Is/Isn't Easy
by T. T. Mitchell


Using Your Own Images And Niche Imaging

Posted by on Sep 9, 2016

When I wrote my post in March talking about 31 mistakes people make in blogging and social media, one of my points about blogging was that a lot of people still aren’t using images on their posts. I don’t fully understand the science of it all, but for some reason not only will more people read your posts but they’re more inclined to share them on other social media sites.


It’s something I wish I’d started earlier than 2011, but them’s the breaks. I mentioned that in another post I did in July, along with saying that I should have been using my own images more often. One of the comments that post received was that images should fit the content for maximum effect.

I responded that the statement was true, but that there were so many topics, like blogging, where finding images that fit becomes a tasking proposition. After all, how many pictures of someone sitting at a computer, or someone with their hand poised to write something, or even hands on a keyboard are out there, let alone all that compelling? He agreed with me that it’s probably better to have an image than not having one at all.

Let’s talk about this concept of niche imaging. Truth be told, if you’re talking about fishing and you have pictures of people fishing or even of fish that’s probably a strong relationship for your visitors. Talking about baking and having a picture of a cake is probably going to grab my attention.

Yet, for all the talk about finding images that match up with the content, have you paid much attention to the large content curation sites and news sites? Have you noticed that quite often what they’re sharing is either an image that they think their visitors will find attractive or compelling, or a stock image that they pull up every time they have a related story, and that quite often the image has nothing to do with the content at all? The items most visited and shared online contain either babies, puppies or kittens or pretty women (which makes my buddy Peter happy lol).

Back in 2010 my friend Scott wrote a guest post here about copyright and images, and a lot of people (myself included) have at one time or another received something from one of those photo copyright sites saying we’ve used something we didn’t know was copywritten, even if it came from a site like Flickr (which has tightened up its rules since then). When you have the whole world of images in your pocket it makes things easier when you’re looking for something you think might fit your content well. When you realize you don’t, that crate of images becomes the size of a book of wooden matches.

That is… unless you feel confident enough to use some of your own images, even if they don’t always fit the content. Truthfully, for mobile speed purposes, using your own images gives you the ability to shrink the size of your images, something the search engines might hold against you. Whenever I use images via the Compfight plugin, even though I love the images I use, there’s nothing I can do to compress them since they’re coming from elsewhere.

Me & Nanci

Check out the image above? That’s not such a bad picture is it? Doesn’t it draw the eyes, no matter what the topic or niche might be? What about the image here, which features myself and one of my best friends from college? For people who know me they get to see another side of me, and for people who don’t they’ll probably figure out it’s a picture of the writer (even if they might guess wrong lol) and someone else if they miss the pictures of me above. Even if neither picture was all that compelling (you’d better think they’re compelling lol), isn’t it better having them here than having nothing but words in the post?

I’m not sure if you’re like me or not, but I have nearly 5,000 of my own images on my computer, and even more in photo books all over the house and at Mom’s house. They may not all be spectacular shots, but they meant something to me or my family at the time they were taken, and some of them can certainly be considered vintage. Many of them are even funny; who doesn’t like funny?

From my perspective, using your own images is a nice place to start. Using images from other sources that can match up with your niche topic are even better when you’re discussing specific business issues or points. As you’ve seen in posts of mine like when I talked about blocking newsletter popups I took a screen print of the setting page of the browser add-on I use to show people how to set it up, which in essence became one of my images instead of something I found online. That type of thing is always helpful also.

Or just go with the babies, puppies or kittens or pretty women; at least you know your articles will be seen, even if your visitors don’t stay long afterwards. 🙂

Digiprove sealCopyright secured by Digiprove © 2016 Mitch Mitchell
Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn1Tweet about this on Twitter14Share on Facebook0

Tags: , ,


Having 5000 of your own images on your computer is outstanding. I don’t think I have over 100. I should follow your example and start downloading photos on my camera and scanning a lot of photos out of old albums so I can have a wealth of my own images in order to prevent some kind of infringement issue that could cause me future problems.

Only once have I received a notice from someone whose photo I used and it was an acknowledgment of thanks with a request to make my caption a bit larger–a request to which I complied. So far I guess I should consider myself fortunate.

Your suggestions here wise and correct. It’s something that I need to do better.

Arlee Bird

September 10th, 2016 | 12:36 PM

Thanks Arlee. I have to admit it was a bit scary getting one of those letters. Back in the day I also got a message from someone whose image I used that I got from Flickr asking me why I didn’t give attribution, to which I answered that the image didn’t say it needed attribution. I hadn’t thought about it at the time and decided to switch from that image to something else. I’ll still use other images here and there but I’m really trying to use more of my own.

September 11th, 2016 | 2:01 AM

Mitch, if for no other reason they reckon that images, as long as you have the correct alt tags, are a great way to boost your SEO!

As you know I create most of my images using The Creator. I also create a lot of them not to mention got a whole lot that are supposed to be free to use.

I think though, for the sake of speed, that I may have to use smaller ones lol
Peter recently posted…Easy Betting Sites Where To Find ThemMy Profile

September 14th, 2016 | 1:42 AM

Yeah, the speed issue is a good one also, especially using the Smush plugin. I hadn’t even thought about the alt tags; I’m always forgetting those. lol

September 14th, 2016 | 2:07 AM

Now, Mitch, that’s not like you to go and forget something so important. lol
Peter recently posted…WTC L38 Smartwatch ReviewMy Profile

September 14th, 2016 | 3:52 AM

For websites I always remember, but for the blogs I’ve rarely even thought about it. You know me; it’s more about the writing than anything else. 🙂

September 14th, 2016 | 9:17 AM
Before you leave a reply; please see the comment policy if this is your first visit. This blog doesn't accept keyword names. I need a real first name or a legitimate nickname that you're known for. If your name has more than 3 words or the email address begins with "info" or "admin", the comment automatically goes to the spam filter; same if there are any links in the comment or if you don't have a gravatar. If your comment goes to spam for any of these reasons, or any other reason listed in this post, it may never show up on the blog (I do forgive the link issue if you've commented on the blog previously and I'll forgive the gravatar thing for first time visitors). If it goes there for any other reason (and I know some do), I'll pull it out as I don't intentionally moderate any comments on this blog.

One last thing; if your link is an affiliate link or goes back to a strange website or webpage I don't like, if I keep your comment I'll remove your link. That's why I have CommentLuv for blogs; if you have a legitimate business just leave that link & no sub-links. Trust me, it's best to read the comment policy if you don't get it, or never see your comments showing up here.

If you like this post, why not donate to the cause? :-)


CommentLuv badge