Comments on: PLR, Private Label Rights

By: Mitch

Mitch — Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:09:37 +0000

That’s kind of the thing, Lamonica. It might be fine, but it still ends up truthfully being something someone else wrote.

By: Lamonica Briehl

Lamonica Briehl — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:28:23 +0000

You may believe this private label product that you only modified is not as good as an original product, however, if you modified the e-book using your own style and knowledge it is a new product. Of course, it was someone else

By: Mitch

Mitch — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 02:01:44 +0000

Very good point, Dennis; one I forgot to mention.

By: Dennis Edell

Dennis Edell — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:07:42 +0000

Always be sure to check the rights page that should come with each package…not all PLR will come with ALL rights.

Dennis Edell´s last blog post..DSWM March Monthly Post Round Up

By: Mitch

Mitch — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:37:55 +0000

Good point, Khaled, and I knew with the very first song that those two weren’t doing it, and told everyone I didn’t think it was them. So, when they were officially found out, folks looked at me with new found respect! lol

By: Mitch

Mitch — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:36:59 +0000

I’m with you on this one, Sire, but I understand the concept for blogging ghostwriters, especially for businesses that want to have a blog, but don’t have anyone who has the time or talent to write one. For a personal blog, that kind of thing doesn’t make lots of sense, unless that person is able to make really good money from their blog, which, I bet, some are.

By: Mitch

Mitch — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:35:29 +0000

Wow, that’s an interesting concept, Iceman; I’d have never thought about anything like that. Well, that’s not totally true; I’ve thought about setting something up with my old newsletter posts for people to read, if they paid for it, but never thought about it for PLR articles. Nice idea; thanks.

By: Mitch

Mitch — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:33:31 +0000

I guess that’s not such a bad attitude to have. I don’t like it myself, but I don’t go out of my way to remove scrapers from my life. But spam,… well, it is what it is, but as long as I catch the stuff that Askimet misses the first time around, I’m happy.

By: Iceman Baldy

Iceman Baldy — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:36:25 +0000

I mean a paid site. Look at http://TheInternetMarketingFiles.com. You can customize some of your PLR in order to benefit from the longer term traffic but customization need only be a Read Me First file that thanks the user of the file and direct them back to your site(s) for updates or resources. Others who use the PLR resources you provide probably won’t make any changes to this file and you get some of the same benefits of traffic without having to do a full rewrite on tons of material.

Iceman Baldy´s last blog post..Don’t Let Distractions Become Your Undoing

By: khaled

khaled — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:54:22 +0000

Mmmm Ghost Writing makes me think of the group Milli Vanilli a late 80′s group who shot to fame with their first album only to be found out that they were lip sinking. It didn’t do them any favours and ended their career I would think the same would happen if someone found out that a blog did the same.
I have no problem with someone not writing any of the content themselves, but when they claim to create the content and discuss it with site visitors as their own its very deceiving.