Social Media, SEO & Your Business

by Mitch Mitchell





Using Your Website
As A Marketing Tool

by Mitch Mitchell


Pages



Embrace The Lead
by T. T. Mitchell





Keys To Leadership
by T. T. Mitchell





Free Download; right-click on book


T. T. Mitchell Consulting, Inc

Promote Your Page Too




Follow Me On Twitter;
Click The Bird!



Listed on BlogShares


«
»


Penn State & Joe Paterno – My Take

Posted by on Nov 14, 2011

I know someone out there has been saying “Is Mitch afraid to have a take on what’s going on at Penn State and with Joe Paterno”? Who me, scared to have a take on something? Ain’t no way! It’s not going to be overwhelmingly popular, but I don’t care; it’s my take.

A little quick history for those of you who aren’t up on this or aren’t from this country. Last weekend it came to light that a former football coach had been accused of molesting young boys initially about 13 or 14 years ago. Then around 2001 or 2002 an assistant football coach told his head coach, Joe Paterno, that he’d actually seen the guy doing something with a young boy in a shower. The head coach passed the information along to the people he reported to, the coach was dismissed, and somehow that ended things.

Only it didn’t end things. Last weekend it comes out that the two men Coach Paterno had reported the incident to had been called before a grand jury and asked about these things, and they had lied about it. They were arrested for keeping their silence and for lying, as child molestation is a big deal. Suddenly however, it threw Coach Paterno into the mix because many people believe he should have gone to the police with his information instead of just following the rules of his state, which said that he was under no legal obligation to do so and instead reporting it to his superiors. The assistant coach who’d seen the action also didn’t report it to the police, following the same process the head coach did.

This turned out not to be good enough for the representatives of the university, who this week fired the coach, who is 84 years old and has been coaching at the school for 62 years and had been head coach for 46 of those years, fired the president of the college, who I assume had some knowledge of this issue and didn’t do anything, and put the assistant coach who brought it up to begin with on paid administrative leave for some reason, although it seems his life was being threatened for not going to the police either.

Word has subsequently come out saying that this coach has not only “allegedly” molested at least 9 children (possibly tens of kids but nine “confirmed” accusations to date), but may have run kind of a (ugh) child prostitution ring, doling out young boys to rich people; it gets more and more disgusting as it goes on. So, this is truly a major deal, and it’s tarnished a program that, as far as anyone knows, has never done anything wrong that the school has been accused of, especially the head coach, always known for being overtly moral in all his dealings.

Okay, that’s some history, and I hope I got it all right. Here come my takes on everything.

One, some people needed to be fired. The two men that have been accused of lying to the grand jury, strangely enough, resigned rather than being fired. Supposedly the university couldn’t fire them for some reason but they knew what was coming. The president was fired because he basically said he and the university would stand fully behind these two men; the board of trustees didn’t like that.

Two, I’m not sure it was totally fair to fire the head coach. I certainly know it wasn’t fair to fire a man who personified the best the university had to offer for as long as he did via a cell phone call. If this man didn’t deserve the dignity of being told to his face that he was being relieved from his job I don’t know who did. That was a cowardly act and I deplore that kind of disloyalty. On the other front, the coach had announced earlier in the day that he would resign at the end of the year; after 62 years he didn’t deserve that much?

Three, did the coach have the responsibility of calling the police to report an action he was told about? This is an interesting morality question, since legally it seems he didn’t do anything wrong by the laws of the state of Pennsylvania. On this one I pull out two scenarios, both of them true in my life.

One, I have a friend who was accused a couple of times of molesting his own daughter when she was younger. These accusations were the result of a custody battle, but the police had to investigate each time. I know Dr. Phil says that when it comes to children everyone should take the action to protect them but there’s always this stigma that sticks around someone accused of this sort of thing, even when it’s proven not to be true, and it wasn’t true for my friend. So, is it fair to totally stigmatize someone who you didn’t see doing something?

Two, what about other types of abuse you know is happening? I’ve known a few women over the years that I’ve worked with that I knew were being physically abused at home. They’d come to work with bruises and say things like they fell down the stairs or ran into a door or something else stupid. I wanted to step in a couple of times but was always told not to interfere. The only thing I was ever able to do was ban this one guy from coming into the hospital at all unless he was coming into the emergency room as a patient. Someone’s going to say “you should have called anyway”; trust me, it’s not that easy to do because the victim, and I’m going to use that term, will almost always side with their abuser, and it makes you look bad.

Three, and be truthful with yourselves, how many of you would take the chance of stepping outside of the chain of command where you work and going directly to the police based on something someone told you? If the assistant coach who saw it went to the police because he’d seen it, that’s one thing. If you’re being told something yet didn’t see it, and you report it, basically it’s just hearsay, so you end up following company rules, which are to move it up to the chain of command. Now, if either of those two other guys hadn’t lied during the grand jury testimony, this whole thing would have gone away and people would be praising the coach for speaking up in the first place.

Four, we all might possibly say we’d have done this or that, but it’s a lie. People don’t like getting involved in anything for fear of getting in trouble. It’s turned into a big scandal because people have been confronted with their own reality. Every day in a big city somewhere a person is murdered and hundreds of witnesses disappear. In China two weeks ago a 2-year-old girl was run over twice and no one did a thing for about 10 minutes until a homeless person ran over to her and started calling for help; she died. We see mothers and fathers slapping their children in public places or yelling and cursing at them and we do nothing because we want to avoid becoming their target, or having someone else say it’s none of our business. So the majority can be as sanctimonious as they want to be; I know they’re just being phony.

And five, I can say this because I’ve kind of been there as the protector. In my late teens and through my mid 20′s I was the protector. I was the guy who’d step in the middle of fights for people I knew and protect them. I used to step in ready to take the punch for my friends into my early 30′s and did so without any worry as to what could happen to me; I have witnesses. Online now, if I see a friend of mine being taken on by someone I’ve stepped into the fray; I’ve done it on this blog and on other blogs.

But in general, as I’ve aged, I’ve realized that it’s not always taken well. People say they want help but they really don’t. Is there a moral obligation to help others? Well, ask yourself how you felt the last time someone tried to talk you into joining their religion because they feel it helped them, and now they want to help save your soul. We don’t want help unless we specifically ask for it.

Does this absolve the guy who did what he did? Nope; he’ll get his. Does this absolve the two guys that lied to the grand jury? Nope, and they’ll get theirs. Does this absolve the head coach, Joe Paterno? In my mind, for a number of factors, yes it does. Could he have done more; yes. Should he have done more; probably. Should he be castigated because he followed the rules and did what pretty much 99.93% of the populace would have done? No.

Look at yourselves first and examine your previous actions in things that have been similar, if not as awful as this scandal, then answer truthfully.

Who’s scared now?
 

Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2011 Mitch Mitchell

Tags: ,

18 Comments »

My prayers go out to the victims and their families and I like to take just a second to say that before I comment.

As a resident of the great state of Pennsylvania, I must admit we have some pretty stupid laws. As it stands now – only educators, administrators, coaches and health care workers are bound to report this type of abuse (hear say or not) to their superiors. (I told you it was a stupid law – didn’t I?) I call it stupid because the law should be amended to state that the alleged abuse must be reported to the police. Of course there will be times when people will be falsely accused. That’s why the police are called in to investigate. Hopefully they do their jobs rights – at least I pray that they do.

Will Sandusky get what he deserves? So far he hasn’t. He got out on his own signature and was at the mall this weekend with a Penn State shirt on. WTF!!

Turns out the judge who released him was a volunteer for his organization so now they have to investigate more into the connection between the two.

I keep hearing how people put “football” ahead of the victims – but personally I think it’s bigger than football – it’s all about money!

One more point – although it might not be relevant. Every time I see a snap shot or the video camera pans over the throngs of Penn State students – there is one thing that is clearly missing.

US
Ileane recently posted..The Emotional Roller Coaster of Blogging “Keep Your Head Up”My Profile

Reply

Mitch Mitchell Reply:

Ileane, I’ve noticed that “us” are missing as well, but what does that say about “us”? The media has had a number of “us” and everyone else commenting on the issue, mainly former players, but that’s about it.

I read that Sandusky was released on $250,000 bail; hey, that’s the legal system in action. There is still supposed to be a veil of “innocent before proven guilty” in this country so not allowing it would violate that rule of thumb. Overall, the whole thing really is about money, and it just seems like some people have lost their minds in this thing. I just kind of advocate for a little bit of balance; certainly not saying something didn’t go wrong, but it’s really taken on a life of its own.

Reply

Ileane Reply:

Mitch, here’s the “no bail” story as told by local Fox News station http://www.myfoxphilly.com/dpp/sports/penn_state/Jerry_Sandusky_Bail_Judge_Ties_To_Charity_Questioned_111411
Ileane recently posted..From Zero To #1 In A Month: 5 SEO Steps For New SitesMy Profile

Reply

Mitch Mitchell Reply:

Wow, that’s certainly a conflict of interest, especially if she didn’t disclose they knew each other beforehand.

Reply

November 14th, 2011 | 9:56 AM

In my life i have had to “rat” on people before and I would do it again. Maybe some people can be complacent in the chain of command and let others suffer but I have never been like that. I say fire them all. The creepy part is every day we hear about yet another person who knew.
mimi torchia boothby Watercolors recently posted..Create an Art Chair for the communityMy Profile

Reply

Mitch Mitchell Reply:

That’s the norm, Mimi. I think people have to decide how they want to handle certain things and what their ultimate responsibilities are. For instance, the coach who’s getting death threats for not calling it is aren’t only because he didn’t call it in to protect the young boys but also because, in some minds, he started this whole mess and they want to kill him for getting Joe Paterno fired. Frankly every one of these types of decisions becomes a tougher call than one might have thought it should be.

Reply

November 14th, 2011 | 10:08 AM
Gay:

Maybe some people can be complacent in the chain of command and let others suffer but I have never been like that.Thanks a lot for sharing this great article..
Gay recently posted..Arizona Gets Inside Information on the 12 Myths of Bankruptcy – Myths 10-12My Profile

Reply

November 14th, 2011 | 10:31 AM

Mitch:
great post as usual, but I’ve got to disagree with you on several points. The man alleged to have abused children was Paterno’s #1 coach–the man rumored to replace him if he ever retired. The coach was forced to resign in 1999 after the alleged incident reported to authorities by the victim’s mother about his showering with a young boy in the PSU locker room 1998. Everyone knew that he was suspected of abusing boys–yet everyone let him continue to associate himself with the program–taking young boys on road trips, using athletic department facilities etc. Everyone knew–including Joe Paterno.

The reason Paterno was fired is because he did not speak up. Why? We will probably never know–something twisted about loyalty and maintaining the PSU reputation. But make no mistake–Paterno had to go because there is no one with more authority at the University and in the football program than Joe. He was the highest paid employee at the school, he is a national icon. He was literally the baronial lord of that tiny city-state known as State College, Pa. The fact that he clammed up about what he knew (or should have known) sent the signal to everyone else to do the same. Joe did not break any laws–in 2002. Pa law at that time only required those witnessing the abuse to report. In 2007 the law was changed to require anyone informed of the abuse to report. So no one other than the graduate assistant broke the reporting law. However, the athletic director and the administrator in charge of the PSU security are both being charged with perjury before the grand jury–a much more serious offense.
Joe testified and told the truth to the grand jury. So he did nothing between 2002 and 2010 on this information. Even as he allowed the abuser to associate with the team and parade his young abuse targets around campus.
Phil recently posted..This Is What They Mean By “Off Year Election”My Profile

Reply

Mitch Mitchell Reply:

Thanks for your position Phil. I think even if he had to go that it was handled badly; if 62 years doesn’t earn you enough respect for a face to face then I don’t know what does, especially since he didn’t do anything illegal and did follow the law; he even reported the thing to the people he was supposed to report it to. As I asked, should he have done more? Probably, but realistically, do you think the majority of people you know would have done just what he did or acted upon themselves and gone to the police? To me, I think that’s where some hypocrisy lies.

Reply

November 14th, 2011 | 10:58 AM

Unfortunately the system rarely works anywhere, Mitch. I don’t think that there can be any compensation for the families and kids or for any other crime or action or lack of action. Ileane and Phil made very interesting points, but about this case I just heard on TV and I am not sure about many of details. For certain similar things are happening nearly everywhere, during the time I was living in UK, there were so many cases where even the church was involved.

Reply

Mitch Mitchell Reply:

Carl, the church is the perfect example for this sort of thing, only it’s not as pervasive as what’s gone on there. I guess the guy was on TV last night being interviewed by phone saying he’s innocent of all the charges and of course in our country one is supposed to be presumed innocent first; yeah, like that happens. Still, it’s affected a lot of lives indirectly and I’m not sure that’s how things are supposed to go.

Reply

November 14th, 2011 | 9:10 PM

Hi Mitch,
Nowadays have a lots of abuses like the one you had given in this article. I had recently been reading some book and researches about abuse( sexual, physical, emotional, etc.). There are reasons why child or the student did not directly report what happened to them not just because they are afraid. But in most cases, the students are letting their teachers do this abusive things on them for grades. ” No one will abuse, if no one will let themselves get abuse”.
vanz recently posted..Do People See You a Leader or a Liability?My Profile

Reply

Mitch Mitchell Reply:

That’s a strong point Steve, which I guess is why it’s good that at least the first coach reported it and then the head coach reported it as well. Overall it seems people are mad at a moral point moreso than a legal one, yet I still think it’s hard to decide on based on what happened and based on what most people would do themselves.

Reply

November 15th, 2011 | 3:29 AM

I’m not sure how I feel about this…Paterno did take the correct steps (that were required at that time) but still…

Anyone can make an anonymous call to child protective services and get the ball rolling…he could have done more.

We as a society have lost all sense of right and wrong…football, jobs and money aside, he should have taken the risk and gone a step furthur.

This isn’t something where maybe the other coach was doing drugs and hurting only himself…he was hurting innocent children!

How do these people sleep at night?
Carolee recently posted..I don’t have a product- I’m missing all the blog hopping, give-away fun!My Profile

Reply

Mitch Mitchell Reply:

Carolee, it’s true that he could have done more, but he didn’t see the event take place. In the workplace a manager never takes action against someone just because another employee saw something. It’s investigated and then acted on. In his case what we don’t know is if Paterno investigated any further or if the two guys that lied to a grand jury investigated any further. A big question is that since most of the things occurred after the guy left the university is it still the university’s fault for not reporting it? I mean, there are plenty of doctors and teachers that get let go from where they are for bad things, then move to another state and get rehired because by law those original employers aren’t allowed to tell it all. So, does someone get to go back and sue all those folks as well? It’s just not so easy when one looks at other things that are somewhat similar.

Reply

November 15th, 2011 | 7:19 AM

What disturbed me most about this case in the beginning right after the Paterno announcememnt was made was how the media blew it up. CNN literally incited students to riot by getting them riled up about the firing. As a journalist, I know when you put a camera on some young people, you encourage them to do and say thing they might not otherwise. P

Personally, I think Paterno was fired to help the University avoid further liability. Should he have been fired? YES!
Beverly Mahone recently posted..Being an Expert Doesn’t Make You Media SavvyMy Profile

Reply

Mitch Mitchell Reply:

Bev, I don’t think there’s anything that could be done as far as liability. As a matter of fact, I don’t really know if the university is liable for anything legally, other than those two guys that lied. Well, they may be liable to the first kid but the others… the university didn’t have anything directly to do with that. Pennsylvania isn’t California, so I’m thinking they might get off from that one.

Reply

November 22nd, 2011 | 1:59 PM

Mitch,

We’ll see. Irregardless, they’re still a bunch of dirty old men!
Beverly Mahone recently posted..How to Celebrate Thanksgiving When Your Nest is EmptyMy Profile

Reply

November 23rd, 2011 | 3:57 PM
If you like this post, why not donate to the cause? :-)
Leave a Reply; please see comment policy if this is your first visit. This blog doesn't accept keyword names, and the comment will be deleted if a real first name isn't put on first. Also, if your name has 3 words or more in it, the comment automatically goes to the spam filter; just so you know.

Comment

CommentLuv badge